Starfield reviewed on PC and Xbox Series X by Dan Stapleton.
It’s never a great sign when someone recommends a game on the grounds that it gets good after more than a dozen hours, but that’s very much the kind of game Starfield is, and I do recommend it. There are a lot of forces working against it, and the combination of disjointed space travel, nonexistent maps, aggravating inventory management, and a slow rollout of essential abilities very nearly did it in. It was the joys piloting a custom spaceship into and out of all sorts of morally ambiguous situations in a rich sci-fi universe that eventually pulled it out of a nosedive. I’m glad that I powered through the early hours, because its interstellar mystery story pays off and, once the ball got rolling, combat on foot and in space gradually became good enough that its momentum carried me into New Game after I’d finished the main story after around 60 hours. Like Skryim and Fallout 4 before it, there’s still an immense amount of quality roleplaying que
1 view
17
4
5 months ago 00:15:05 1
Core i5 13400F vs Ryzen 7 5700X3D | RTX 4070 SUPER | Test In 12 Games | 2024
6 months ago 01:01:10 1
Todd Howard Interview: Fallout, Starfield Updates, and More - Kinda Funny Gamescast
6 months ago 00:18:10 1
Was The Ryzen 5 5600 A Mistake To Recommend Gamers? 6 vs. 16-cores in 2024